Showing posts with label Dyscalcula. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dyscalcula. Show all posts

Monday, October 24, 2011

The DysCovery Centre: Prof Amanda Kirby

The Dyscovery Centre  was set up over 13 years ago in response to a lack of co-ordination between health and education providing services for children and adults with developmental disorders.

During this time it has developed into a specialist and high quality service providing clinical services, undertaking research,providing consultancy services and training at all levels from awareness raising  courses to Masters degree level.

The inter-disciplinary team helps individuals with living and learning difficulties, such as Developmental Co-ordination Disorder, Dyspraxia, Dyslexia, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Asperger's Syndrome.

The team is led by Professor Amanda Kirby.All members of the clinical team are State Registered, qualified, experienced in learning difficulties, and adhere to professional standards and Codes of Practice.

The clinical team helps people of all ages, and takes referrals from statutory and voluntary bodies as well as directly from individuals.

The benefits of using the Dyscovery Centre include:
  • Assessment by appropriate team members after consultation and information gathering, tailored to the individual.
  • One-stop shop: Providing a co-ordinated approach in one place and time.
  • Active research centre- up to date with latest research in the field of developmental disorders.
  • Professionals who have experience working with schools, parents and adults.
  • Ability to look at whole child/person. 
  • Access to specialised resources and supporting information. 
The Dyscovery Centre has now moved to its permanent home on the Caerleon Campus. 

Their new address is, The Dyscovery Centre, Felthorpe House, Caerleon Campus, Lodge Road, Caerleon, Newport, NP18 3QR. 

Their telephone number has remained the same: 01633 432330
Their email address is: Amanda.kirby@newport.ac.uk
Website: www.dyscovery.org
 

Monday, June 20, 2011

Difficulty estimating quantity linked to math learning disability - NIH

Researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health have discovered that the innate ability to estimate quantities is impaired in children who have a math learning disability.

The link between difficulty estimating quantities and math difficulties was seen only in children who had a math learning disability, and not in those who did poorly in math but were not considered to be learning disabled.

"The findings suggest that students may struggle with math for very different reasons," said Kathy Mann Koepke, Ph.D., director of the Mathematics and Science Cognition and Learning program at the NIH’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), which funded the study.

"Research to identify these reasons may lead to new ways of identifying those at risk, and developing the means to help them."

Math learning disability is also referred to as dyscalculia.

The study was published in Child Development and was conducted by Michèle Mazzocco, Ph.D., at the Kennedy Krieger Institute and the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and her colleagues, Lisa Feigenson, Ph.D., and Justin Halberda, Ph.D., also at Johns Hopkins.

In earlier research, Drs. Feigenson and Halberda have shown that the innate ability to estimate and compare quantities is present in infancy and improves with age.

"People rely on this ability in daily life," Dr. Mazzocco said. "A familiar example is when people size up which line will move more quickly at the grocery store, based on their perception of the number of persons and items per line."

The researchers compared children’s ability to estimate quantity with their level of mathematics achievement.

To conduct the study, the researchers gave 71 ninth graders two series of tests designed to measure their ability to estimate quantities, a capability governed by what the researchers referred to as the approximate number system (ANS).

The students were a subset of a larger sample of 161 students from Dr. Mazzocco's ongoing long-term research study. The children's math abilities had been tested at regular intervals since kindergarten.

The ninth graders were classified into four groups, based on math achievement scores they had received since kindergarten.
  • above the 95th percentile (high achieving)
  • 25th to 95th percentile (typically achieving)
  • 11th to 25th percentile (low achieving)
  • 10th percentile and below (math learning disabled)
For the first series of ANS tests, the students viewed a computer screen showing a group of blue and yellow dots, and were asked to say whether more blue or yellow dots appeared.

In the second series, nine to 15 dots of one color appeared, and the students were asked to say how many dots they saw.
Images similar to those used in the test procedure.
To measure children's ability to estimate and compare quantities, the researchers administered two series of tests. In the first, the children viewed groups of dots and were asked to say whether there were more blue or yellow dots. In the second, nine to 15 dots of one color appeared, and the children were asked to say how many dots they saw. Each screen was visible for only one fifth of a second, so the children wouldn't have time to count the dots.
Each screen flashed before their eyes for one fifth of a second, so the students did not have time to count the dots before answering. Each series of tests consisted of dozens of screens; the researchers considered the most accurate answers across the two series to indicate a more highly developed approximate number system.

The researchers found that students with math learning disability (math scores at or below the 10th percentile) had the poorest ANS scores. Dr. Mazzocco said that this finding suggests that problems with the ANS underlie math difficulties for children in this group.

However, children in the 11th to 25th percentile, on average, were no more likely to have poor ANS scores than were children in higher percentiles, who had no mathematical difficulties. It seems likely, Dr. Mazzocco said, that math difficulties in this group stem from a cause or causes distinct from the ANS.

"Children with mathematical learning difficulties are often viewed as a uniform group of students, for whom a single type of special instruction or math curriculum is appropriate," Dr. Mazzocco said. "Our findings suggest, however, that children have difficulty with math for different reasons."

Approximately 10 percent of school-age children have persistent and significant difficulties with math, and many more fail to achieve basic levels of mathematics achievement, Dr. Mazzocco said.

"If you have a health problem, a physician will examine you to determine the details of your condition and then will recommend a treatment plan specific to your needs," said Dr. Mazzocco.

"In the same way, educators need to be able to determine the factors underlying math difficulties so that they can tailor instructional methods to individual students’ needs.

A poor number sense seems to underlie math learning disability for many individuals, but it may not underlie poor math achievement for all students who struggle with math."

About the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD):

The NICHD sponsors research on development, before and after birth; maternal, child, and family health; reproductive biology and population issues; and medical rehabilitation. For more information, visit the Institute’s Web site at http://www.nichd.nih.gov/.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the US nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centres and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

NIH is the primary US federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases.

For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Dyscalcula and Number-processing skills in adults with dyslexia

Overall Summary of Scientific Study and Results
The present study investigated basic numerical skills and arithmetic in adults with developmental dyslexia. Participants performed exact and approximate calculation, basic numerical tasks (e.g., counting; symbolic number comparison; spatial-numerical association of response codes, SNARC), and visuospatial tasks (mental rotation and visual search tasks).

The group with dyslexia showed a marginal impairment in counting compared to age- and IQ-matched controls, and they were impaired in exact addition, in particular with respect to speed. They were also significantly slower in multiplication. In basic number processing, however, there was no significant difference in performance between those with dyslexia and controls. Both groups performed similarly on subtraction and approximate addition tasks.

These findings indicate that basic number processing in adults with dyslexia is intact. Their difficulties are restricted to the verbal code and are not associated with deficits in nonverbal magnitude representation, visual Arabic number form, or spatial cognition.

The Study details
It has long been recognised that language is a uniquely human ability. More recently it has been proposed that humans have an innate capacity to perceive numerosity, sometimes called the “number sense”.

The role of language in the development of human number representations (and hence mathematics) is debated. According to Dehaene's triple code model, three codes underpin our ability to process numbers and hence become numerate: a verbal code (linked to the language system); an analogue magnitude representation (underlying approximate calculation); and a visual code (linked to the Arabic number form).

Neuropsychological patients
Research on neuropsychological patients provides evidence for a double dissociation between language and number-processing systems, but this evidence does not imply that these systems develop independently.

From a developmental perspective, some theorists propose that language is essential for the development of numerical competencies, and there is evidence that the structure of the language system in which one grows up shapes the development of numerical concepts. Others, however, argue that numerical competence can develop independently of language.

Although less studied than reading difficulties, problems of mathematical development provide one way of understanding the relationships between language and number skills. Moreover, reading difficulties (RD) are often accompanied by problems with number work: Estimates of the overlap between reading difficulties and mathematical difficulties (MD) range from 2.3% to 40%.

Within the framework of the triple code model proposed by Dehaene, the most likely candidate for explaining the overlap between reading and mathematical difficulties is the verbal code. According to Dehaene, the verbal code is used most strongly for counting, for addition, and in multiplication tables, while approximate calculation and comparison as well as parity decision are supported more by the nonverbal codes.

Number-processing deficits in dyslexia
A number of clinical studies have documented the mathematical difficulties experienced by people with dyslexia.

Reviewing this literature, Simmons and Singleton concluded that the main difficulty is in recalling number facts. Thus, several studies report children with dyslexia to be slow at calculating or verifying sums.

Problems in multiplication and subtraction are common. Simmons and Singleton proposed that the mathematical difficulties observed in dyslexia might be related to phonological-processing deficits (that also cause reading and spelling problems).

Consistent with this, a number of studies have reported that phonological-processing abilities predict arithmetic impairment.

Contrary to this view, Landerl, Bevan, and Butterworth argue that learning to read and learning arithmetic are independent processes and that “fact retrieval is not, in essence, a verbally mediated process”.

The basis for their assertion came from a study of 8-9-year-old children with reading and/or arithmetic difficulties in which they classified children into three groups:

  • (a) children with dyslexia who did not have arithmetical difficulties (dyslexia-only);
  • (b) children with mathematical difficulties who did not have dyslexia (MD-only);
  • (c) children with dyslexia and MD.

NB: In tests of digit number naming, children with dyslexia-only performed at the same level as controls.

Children classified as having MD-only, however, had longer response latencies—indeed, even longer than those of the children with dyslexia and MD. They went on to argue that children with pure dyslexia do not experience number-processing deficits.

This conclusion needs to be treated with caution. First, the cut-offs used to define mathematical difficulties (3 standard deviations below the mean) and dyslexia (below the 25th percentile) were different, and the criterion used to define dyslexia was relatively lenient.

Second, it is not clear whether the dyslexia group had impairments in phonological processing. These issues limit the ability to generalise on the findings, and therefore the results may not be applied to all people with dyslexia.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Augmented Mobile Face Recognition



Recognizr is an augmented reality application that is in the prototype stage. It was developed as an AR tech demo and experiment for future mobile UI requirements.

The application uses Polar Rose’s FaceLib recognition engine, the prototype is working on Android devices.

Let me know what you think

Monday, February 15, 2010

Mindroom - Learning Difficulties - Dyslexia Information

Mindroom - Learning Difficulties - Dyslexia Information

DYSLEXIA
Dyslexia is characterised by specific problems in learning to read and write.
It is best described as a combination of abilities and difficulties that affect the learning process in one or more of reading, spelling, writing.

Dyscalcula - problems with mathematics

Dysgraphia - a learning disability resulting from the difficulty in expressing thoughts in writing. It generally refers to extremely poor handwriting.

There are three types of dyslexia– motor, visual, auditory

Associated features


  • Poor working memory – especially for sequenced, auditory – linguistic material
  • Difficulties with phonology – the sounds in words.
  • Problems in distinguishing left/right
  • Poor sense of direction
  • Difficulties with time and tense
  • Visual and auditory perceptual difficulties
  • Unexpectedly poor reading in relation to general ability
  • Spelling problems
  • Difficulty remembering telephone numbers and appointments
  • Bad handwriting
  • Difficulty learning things by rote e.g. months of the year
  • Poor concentration

Click here for further recommended reading on Dyslexia